Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans: Notes on the Screening of a Silent Film

Montreal's Film Society

by David Hanley Volume 23, Issue 7 / July 2019 7 minutes (1523 words)

Here are 14 more or less random observations on attending a recent presentation of F.W. Murnau’s 1927 silent classic Sunrise:

1. The screening was presented by the Montreal Film Society/Cinéclub de Montréal. The President and founder of the Film Society, Philippe Spurrell, has been showing films from his personal collection of 16 and 35mm prints for over a quarter of a century in a variety of venues around Montreal. He currently shows films every other Sunday at Concordia University’s downtown campus, but also stages several additional “film events” every year, including twice yearly screenings of silent films at the Westmount Park United Church. The first of these was in October, 2012, with the unlikely (given the venue) double feature of horror classics The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1919) and Nosferatu(1922).

2. The Church in the Park, as it is popularly known, is a swell venue. Its setting among the greenery of Westmount Park makes it a popular choice for weddings, whether or not the couples belong to the United Church. I’m far from an expert on the various types of Protestants, but the United folks seem to combine a relaxed and friendly attitude about that sort of thing with a nice sense of tradition. So, along with its ecumenical approach to weddings, Climate Café offering vegetarian cooking classes, and varied community programs, there are also stained glass windows, plaques bearing the names of parishioners who died fighting in World Wars I and II, rows of pews that offer seating for up to 300 worshippers under a high, vaulted ceiling, and a vintage Casavant organ. The movies are projected on a screen set up above the altar and the show generally doesn’t start until the sun has set and light no longer streams through the windows. It’s not an obvious place to show movies, but it works beautifully. The acoustics, as might be expected in a well-designed church, are excellent.

The outside of the Westmount Park Church

3. Spurrell argues that the setting and architecture evoke a bygone era in the same way that the films do. Similarly, his insistence on showing only 16 and 35mm prints, even if there are higher quality Blu-Rays of the same films easily available, is part of the event’s appeal. The stately period décor functions in much the same way as the occasional imperfections or reel change marks in the film prints: they are markers of authenticity and very much a part of the reason that a whole lot of folks who wouldn’t watch a silent film on television are willing to pay to watch one while sitting in a wooden pew for a couple of hours. It’s not just a film screening they are attending, it’s an experience.

4. Plus you can buy beer and popcorn. There is an undeniable transgressive pleasure in sipping a beer and munching on popcorn in a church.

5. Silent films are often shown at 24 frames a second, which is the standard for sound films, but silent films were shot at anywhere between 12 and 40 frames per second. One reason many find movement in silent films unnatural or jerky is that they are watching them at the wrong speed. Spurrell projects the films himself, not only making sure the frame rate is correct, but allowing some room for experimentation. For example, in a screening of The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923), he increased the projection speed for the climax. It went over very well, so I wouldn’t be surprised if there were projectionists in the 1920s who did the same.

6. There was an opening short film before the main event. One thing that must be said about Spurrell’s film events is that there is always an effort to give the public more than they expect. In this case, it was the 20-minute Charley Chase comedy His Wooden Wedding (1925). Chase is rarely mentioned in the same breath as his contemporaries Chaplin, Keaton, and Lloyd, but his best work is easily as funny as anything they produced, and His Wooden Wedding features Charley very close to his peak. The audience certainly loved it, easily accepting the absurd premise (a groom receives an anonymous note from a romantic rival stating that his bride-to-be has a wooden leg, which she doesn’t, and chaos follows) and laughing increasingly loudly at the string of brilliant gags. Chase’s knockabout, absurdist humour isn’t the most obvious introduction to a film as somber as Sunrise, but I can’t say I heard any complaints.

7. Spurrell introduced Sunrise as “the last great silent film,” which it isn’t. 1 But it is important, arguably the film most responsible for bringing the German Expressionist style to Hollywood. It’s not that it was a huge box office hit at the time, but it was one of those films that impressed people in the industry, which is reflected in its winning for “Best Unique and Artistic Picture” at the first Oscar ceremony and its influence on Hollywood filmmakers, notably John Ford.


8. Spurrell also asked how many in the audience had already seen Sunrise, and, although the church was packed, less than a dozen hands went up, so he is clearly doing the Lord’s work.

9. As is well known, silent films were rarely really silent, and they were usually accompanied by live music. The Film Society carries on this tradition, always recruiting top notch local musicians to accompany the films screened. The musicians on this occasion were André Castenon, who played piano for His Wooden Wedding and manned the vintage ship bell for Sunrise, and he was joined by Guillaume Martineau (piano and organ), Jean-Félix Mailloux (cello and bass), and Aurilièn Tomassi (clarinet) for the feature. They did a terrific job, particularly during Sunrise‘s climactic storm, with the vintage organ providing the necessary thunder as the boat capsizes.

10. It is difficult to overemphasize how central live music is to the experience. Spurrell picks Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ (1925) as his favourite of the Film Society silent film presentations, largely because of how good a job the musicians did in bringing the film to life. In particular, he singles out the way percussion was used to first create and then build tension and excitement during the film’s famous chariot race. 2

11. I should mention the audience gave Sunrise a sustained ovation at the end, followed by a buzz of excited chatter. How many members of the audience would have the same reaction watching even a pristine transfer of the film at home on a Blu-ray with a soundtrack?

12. Spurrell and his team of eight volunteers put on a show at reasonable prices. Screenings in the past few years of silent films such as The Man Who Laughs (1928) and the restored Metropolis (1926) at Place des Arts had ticket prices up to four or five times higher than the Film Society, and in an arguably less interesting venue. The money raised from ticket sales pay for the presentation and expenses throughout the year that keep the Cinéclub/Film Society running. The proceeds from the rent and snack bar sales (including beer) go to the church, much of it for the upkeep of the Casavant organ.

13. A possible future screening is the Douglas Fairbanks swashbuckler The Black Pirate (1926) in two-strip Technicolor.

14. I’m a sucker for this sort of thing, and some of my favourite film experiences have been watching silent films with live music. Among the most memorable were seeing The Big Parade (1925) accompanied by the London Symphony Orchestra (the pounding of a single, ominous drum accompanying the soldiers as they march through no man’s land), a jazz combo playing behind The Docks of New York (1928), a five-piece Australian band elevating the creaky Aussie melodrama The Sentimental Bloke (1919) to something resembling classic status, and the previously mentioned Film Society presentation of Ben-Hur. Sunrise is a remarkable film, and this is as close to the optimum way to see it if you possibly can. Which makes the evening another great movie memory. The Lord’s work, indeed.

Inside a Westmount Park Church screening

Full disclosure: I have been a friend of Phil Spurrell’s and a semi-regular attendee at Film Society events since the mid-90s. And my sister got married at that church.


  1. Some of the great silent films released after Sunrise: The Docks of New York (Josef von Sternberg, 1928), The Crowd (King Vidor, 1928), Lonesome (Paul Fejos, 1928), Beggars of Life (William Wellman, 1928), The Cameraman and Steamboat Bill Jr (both Buster Keaton, 1928), The Wind (Victor Sjöstrom, 1928), Un chapeau de paille d’Italie (René Clair, 1928), La passion de Jeanne d’Arc (Carl Theodor Dreyer, 1928), October (Sergei Eisenstein, 1928), Man with a Movie Camera (Dziga Vertov, 1929), Arsenal (Aleksandr Dovzhenko, 1929), Pandora’s Box (G.W. Pabst, 1929), I Was Born, But . . . and An Inn in Tokyo (1932 and 1935, both by Yasujiro Ozu), not to mention Chaplin’s City Lights (1931) and Modern Times (1936). I guess I’ve beaten this point to death, but anybody who’s read this far would probably add a few of their own favourites to this list.
  2. The Cinéclub/Film Society will have an encore presentation of Ben-Hur in February, 2020, at Salle Bourgie, a church-turned-concert hall in downtown Montreal.

Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans: Notes on the Screening of a Silent Film

David Hanley has a BFA and MA in Film Studies from Concordia University and is currently pursuing a PhD in Indigenous and Canadian Studies at Carleton University, where he has also taught in the Department of Film Studies. As well as being a frequent contributor to Offscreen, he has had pieces published by the University of Toronto Quarterly, Canadian Journal of Irish Studies, Synoptique, The Projector, Isis, and Nuacht. He also contributed several entries to the Historical Dictionary of South American Cinema by Dr. Peter H. Rist (Rowman & Littlefield, 2014), and chapters to the books Reclaiming 1940s Horror Cinema: Traces of a Lost Decade (Lexington Books, 2015) and The Spaces and Places of Canadian Popular Culture (Canadian Scholars’ Press, 2019). He has been a programmer for Cine Gael of Montreal’s annual series of contemporary Irish films since 2011.

Volume 23, Issue 7 / July 2019 Film Reviews   f.w. murnau   montreal   phil spurrell   silent cinema   the film society